UCLA animal researchers step up efforts against protesters

Oct. 21, 2009 | Adolfo Guzman-Lopez | KPCC
Download

Scientists at UCLA are stepping up their campaign against violent extremists and others who say there's no human benefit from experiments on animals.

Billboards around the Southland and a full-page newspaper advertisement in the Los Angeles Times last weekend extolled an idea that scientists assumed was a given: animal experiments lead to advances in science.

Many animal rights groups disagree. Some stage peaceful protests while others advocate going as far as killing scientists to stop this research.

For years, scientists have refused to counter activists who claim that animal experimentation has led to no significant medical breakthroughs. That approach changed months ago when UCLA psychology researcher David Jentsh, a victim of violent vandalism, broke with custom and organized a large protest. The group he's formed, Pro-Test for Science, is holding another demonstration this weekend.

Jentsch says research protesters run the gamut. "I believe there's lots of animal rights activists who are reasonable, civilized, and want to achieve their goals in a more straightforward way that doesn't involve telling mistruths and bombing things."

Jentsch says he plans events with local groups in the coming months and hopes to foster this kind of activism among scientists from other universities. Jerry Vlasak, a surgeon and spokesman for several of the groups that advocate violence against scientists, says he doesn't think animal research opponents, violent or not, will collaborate with the scientists because he believes there's no justification for harming animals in any way.

Comments:

Will
I believe there are scientists who are reasonable, civilized, and who peacefully advocate for the right to harm and kill animals. Unfortunately, many other scientists are actively engaged in this sort of violence against nonhuman animals and people like David Jentsch actively encourage the perpetuation of this violence.

It is difficult to have a dialogue, when one party to the debate is routinely inflicting grave injury and death on innocent and vulnerable individuals.

Chris
And I believe that there are physicians who are reasonable, civilized, and who peacefully advocate for the right to kill unborn infants. Unfortunately many other physicians are actively engaged against this form of violence.

It is difficult to have a dialogue when one party to the debates is routinely inflicting death against innocent and vulnerable individuals. Therefore means of action other than peaceful debate may be necessary to terminate said action.

Phil Hampton [Official UCLA Mouthpiece]
While UCLA placed the Los Angeles Times ad, the billboards are part of a national public education campaign managed by the Foundation for Biomedical Research. See: http://www.fbresearch.org/Portals/9/ResearchSavesPR.pdf